Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NFAAX
CNPAX vs NFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NFAAX
CNPAX vs NFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NFAAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and NFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. NFAAX (831M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NFAAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs NFAAX (0.18). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NFAAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NFAAX (16 years). NFAAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). NFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). NFAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFAAX: CNPAX (250) vs NFAAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. NFAAX (4.54). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. NFAAX (4.97).
| CNPAX | NFAAX | CNPAX / NFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.12 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 7.569 | 70% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 831M | 20,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.18 | 536% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 4.54 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 51.52 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 4.97 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 24.81 | 467% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers