Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NFAAX
CNPAX vs NFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NFAAX
CNPAX vs NFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NFAAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NFAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. NFAAX (816M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NFAAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs NFAAX (0.18). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NFAAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NFAAX (16 years). NFAAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). NFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). NFAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFAAX: CNPAX (250) vs NFAAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. NFAAX (1.09). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.85 vs. NFAAX (2.10).
| CNPAX | NFAAX | CNPAX / NFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.12 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 5.781 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 816M | 20,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.18 | 528% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 1.09 | 612% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 48.94 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 2.10 | 612% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 22.97 | 493% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers