Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PAXGX
CNPAX vs PAXGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PAXGX
CNPAX vs PAXGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PAXGX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and PAXGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PAXGX (95.7M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PAXGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs PAXGX (0.16). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PAXGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PAXGX (8 years). PAXGX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). PAXGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAXGX: CNPAX (250) vs PAXGX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. PAXGX (-1.23). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.40 vs. PAXGX (9.89).
| CNPAX | PAXGX | CNPAX / PAXGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.739 | 5.596 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 95.7M | 177,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.16 | 586% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | -1.23 | -660% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.39 | 16.17 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.40 | 9.89 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers