Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PAXGX
CNPAX vs PAXGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PAXGX
CNPAX vs PAXGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PAXGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and PAXGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PAXGX (96.3M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PAXGX: CNPAX (0.97) vs PAXGX (0.16). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PAXGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PAXGX (8 years). PAXGX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). PAXGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAXGX: CNPAX (250) vs PAXGX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. PAXGX (-1.23). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.85 vs. PAXGX (7.74).
| CNPAX | PAXGX | CNPAX / PAXGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 5.776 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 96.3M | 176,532% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.16 | 599% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | -1.23 | -541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 14.26 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 7.74 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement