Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PRGSX
CNPAX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PRGSX
CNPAX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PRGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRGSX (8.68B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs PRGSX (0.12). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PRGSX (31 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: CNPAX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.76 vs. CNPAX (7.37). PRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.06 vs. CNPAX (13.82).
| CNPAX | PRGSX | CNPAX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 20.299 | 26% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 8.68B | 1,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.12 | 791% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 22.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 54.58 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 16.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 205.96 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers