Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs RGERX
CNPAX vs RGERX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGERX
CNPAX vs RGERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGERX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and RGERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RGERX (818M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGERX: CNPAX (0.97) vs RGERX (0.46). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGERX: CNPAX (24 years) vs RGERX (20 years). RGERX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). RGERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). RGERX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: RGERX (0) vs CNPAX (250). RGERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.25 vs. CNPAX (6.66). RGERX return over 5 years is better than : 13.97 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | RGERX | CNPAX / RGERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.92 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 14.127 | 35% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 818M | 20,782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.46 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 11.25 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 39.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 13.97 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 124.28 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers