Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs RGERX
CNPAX vs RGERX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGERX
CNPAX vs RGERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGERX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and RGERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGERX (834M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGERX: CNPAX (0.95) vs RGERX (0.46). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGERX: CNPAX (24 years) vs RGERX (19 years). RGERX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). RGERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). RGERX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: RGERX (0) vs CNPAX (250). RGERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.09 vs. CNPAX (13.85). RGERX return over 5 years is better than : 24.62 vs. CNPAX (19.97).
| CNPAX | RGERX | CNPAX / RGERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.92 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 15.236 | 48% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 834M | 19,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.46 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 17.09 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 45.27 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 24.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | 133.28 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers