Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and RGPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RGPAX (333M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs RGPAX (0.28). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs RGPAX (7 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). RGPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPAX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX (6.78) and CNPAX (6.66) have marching annual gain over last year. RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.30 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | RGPAX | CNPAX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 1.248 | 394% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 333M | 51,051% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.28 | 345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 6.78 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 40.00 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 14.30 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers