Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RGPAX (451M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs RGPAX (0.28). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). RGPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPAX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. CNPAX (7.38). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. CNPAX (14.38).
| CNPAX | RGPAX | CNPAX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 2.413 | 240% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 451M | 38,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.28 | 342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 8.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.24 | 47.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.38 | 15.88 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers