Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGPAX
CNPAX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGPAX (463M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs RGPAX (0.27). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). RGPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPAX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.71 vs. CNPAX (13.85). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.29 vs. CNPAX (19.97).
| CNPAX | RGPAX | CNPAX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 4.867 | 149% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 463M | 35,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.27 | 349% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 15.71 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 51.10 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 22.29 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement