Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SCGVX
CNPAX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SCGVX
CNPAX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. SCGVX (739M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SCGVX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: CNPAX (24 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SCGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: CNPAX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. SCGVX (-30.37). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. SCGVX (-46.70).
| CNPAX | SCGVX | CNPAX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.22 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.22 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 2.352 | 226% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 739M | 23,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -30.37 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | -13.95 | -245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -46.70 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 27.42 | 423% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers