Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SCMGX
CNPAX vs SCMGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SCMGX
CNPAX vs SCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SCMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and SCMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SCMGX (794M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SCMGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SCMGX (0.07). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SCMGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs SCMGX (16 years). SCMGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCMGX: CNPAX (250) vs SCMGX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. SCMGX (-26.62). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. SCMGX (-43.67).
| CNPAX | SCMGX | CNPAX / SCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | 3.106 | 208% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 794M | 21,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.07 | 1,419% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | -26.62 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | -6.91 | -600% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | -43.67 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | 43.00 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers