Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SGACX
CNPAX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SGACX
CNPAX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and SGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SGACX (146M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SGACX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SGACX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SGACX: CNPAX (24 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: CNPAX (250) vs SGACX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. SGACX (-19.45). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. SGACX (-42.96).
| CNPAX | SGACX | CNPAX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.00 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.12 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | -6.887 | -94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 146M | 117,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | -19.45 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | -24.36 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | -42.96 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | 15.13 | 873% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement