Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SGACX
CNPAX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SGACX
CNPAX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SGACX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and SGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. SGACX (128M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SGACX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SGACX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SGACX: CNPAX (25 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: CNPAX (250) vs SGACX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. SGACX (-18.61). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. SGACX (-44.46).
| CNPAX | SGACX | CNPAX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.00 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.12 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | -4.667 | -141% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 128M | 132,031% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -18.61 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | -26.24 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | -44.46 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | 9.22 | 1,279% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers