Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SGAPX
CNPAX vs SGAPX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SGAPX
CNPAX vs SGAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SGAPX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and SGAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. SGAPX (127M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SGAPX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SGAPX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SGAPX: CNPAX (25 years) vs SGAPX (13 years). SGAPX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SGAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAPX: CNPAX (250) vs SGAPX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. SGAPX (-16.49). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. SGAPX (-38.18).
| CNPAX | SGAPX | CNPAX / SGAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | -4.748 | -138% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 127M | 133,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -16.49 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | -20.21 | -196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | -38.18 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | 27.74 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers