Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SGAPX
CNPAX vs SGAPX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SGAPX
CNPAX vs SGAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SGAPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and SGAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. SGAPX (149M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SGAPX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SGAPX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SGAPX: CNPAX (24 years) vs SGAPX (13 years). SGAPX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SGAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAPX: CNPAX (250) vs SGAPX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. SGAPX (-17.37). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. SGAPX (-36.27).
| CNPAX | SGAPX | CNPAX / SGAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | -4.653 | -114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 149M | 114,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -17.37 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | -19.20 | -178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -36.27 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 29.28 | 396% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers