Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.22
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.14B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. WAGSX (12.5M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. WAGSX (0.97). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.82 vs. WAGSX (-3.84).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.974 | 3.645 | 548% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 12.5M | 1,312,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.90 | 0.97 | 1,435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.46 | 40.72 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.82 | -3.84 | -1,010% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement