Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.93
Change+$0.38 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$13.29
Change+$0.08 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.28M
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WAGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. WAGSX (14.3M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.49) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX (24.00) and WAGSX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). WAGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. CNPAX (11.17). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. WAGSX (14.18).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.944 | 10.108 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 14.3M | 1,090,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 14.08 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 44.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | 14.18 | 329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement