Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. WAGSX (12.5M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.97) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. WAGSX (-0.78). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.85 vs. WAGSX (-20.45).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.81 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 3.257 | 151% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 12.5M | 1,360,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | -0.78 | -851% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 14.54 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | -20.45 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers