Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WAGSX
CNPAX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WAGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. WAGSX (10M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPAX (25 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. WAGSX (-4.62). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. WAGSX (-25.33).
| CNPAX | WAGSX | CNPAX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.81 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 0.814 | 806% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 10M | 1,690,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -4.62 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 17.12 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | -25.33 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement