Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WCMGX
CNPAX vs WCMGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WCMGX
CNPAX vs WCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WCMGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WCMGX (1.7B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WCMGX: CNPAX (0.97) vs WCMGX (0.41). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WCMGX: CNPAX (25 years) vs WCMGX (13 years). WCMGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMGX: CNPAX (250) vs WCMGX (100000). WCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.57 vs. CNPAX (8.49). WCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. CNPAX (15.27).
| CNPAX | WCMGX | CNPAX / WCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.048 | 12.759 | 71% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 1.7B | 9,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 16.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.52 | 86.92 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.27 | 34.42 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.00 | 174.56 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers