Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WGGSX
CNPAX vs WGGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WGGSX
CNPAX vs WGGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WGGSX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and WGGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WGGSX (12.8M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WGGSX: CNPAX (0.97) vs WGGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WGGSX: CNPAX (25 years) vs WGGSX (7 years). WGGSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WGGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WGGSX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. WGGSX (1.75). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.68 vs. WGGSX (-17.62).
| CNPAX | WGGSX | CNPAX / WGGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.437 | 6.195 | 152% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 12.8M | 1,296,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 1.75 | 498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.39 | 23.68 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | -17.62 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement