Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs WGGSX
CNPAX vs WGGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs WGGSX
CNPAX vs WGGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. WGGSX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and WGGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. WGGSX (12.1M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than WGGSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs WGGSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than WGGSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs WGGSX (7 years). WGGSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). WGGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGSX: CNPAX (250) vs WGGSX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. WGGSX (-6.09). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.37 vs. WGGSX (-20.89).
| CNPAX | WGGSX | CNPAX / WGGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.074 | 0.477 | 645% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 12.1M | 1,404,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | -6.09 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.37 | 13.86 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.37 | -20.89 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement