Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.04B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.63
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.33M
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. ZGFAX (436M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.51) vs ZGFAX (0.21). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. CNPAX (9.81). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.03 vs. CNPAX (43.47).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.914 | 11.979 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 436M | 34,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.21 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 16.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.67 | 45.00 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.47 | 56.03 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement