Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.09
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.74
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets442.75M
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. ZGFAX (443M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.45) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. CNPAX (11.66). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. CNPAX (27.82).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.92 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.484 | 12.607 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 443M | 35,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.20 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 13.13 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.09 | 43.29 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.82 | 49.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement