Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.96B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.88M
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. ZGFAX (437M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.48) vs ZGFAX (0.21). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. ZGFAX (15.44). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. CNPAX (38.85).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.141 | 10.439 | 135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 437M | 35,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.21 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.90 | 15.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.79 | 35.91 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.85 | 49.86 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.80 | N/A | - |