Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$20.26
Change-$0.12 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets467.94M
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. ZGFAX (468M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.46) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.21 vs. CNPAX (13.83). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.25 vs. CNPAX (37.19).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.302 | 16.258 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 468M | 35,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.20 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 18.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 62.50 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.19 | 55.25 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement