Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFAX (343M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs ZGFAX (0.70). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). ZGFAX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. ZGFAX (1.13). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.12 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 1.041 | 473% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 343M | 49,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.70 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 1.13 | 590% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 25.57 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 21.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers