Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFAX (350M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs ZGFAX (0.73). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). ZGFAX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. ZGFAX (-2.78). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.08 vs. CNPAX (13.82).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | -1.457 | -366% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 350M | 48,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.73 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -2.78 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 21.92 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 19.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers