Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFAX
CNPAX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ZGFAX (356M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs ZGFAX (0.73). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). ZGFAX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. ZGFAX (-3.76). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.21 vs. CNPAX (16.61).
| CNPAX | ZGFAX | CNPAX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | -4.735 | -136% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 356M | 48,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.73 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | -3.76 | -354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | 23.37 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | 18.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement