Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.16
Change-$0.63 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.87
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.19M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ZGFIX (443M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.45) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.90 vs. CNPAX (12.12). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.35 vs. CNPAX (27.74).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.598 | 12.898 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 443M | 36,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.20 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 12.90 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 44.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.74 | 51.35 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement