Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$20.34
Change-$0.13 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets467.94M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. ZGFIX (468M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.46) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.25 vs. CNPAX (13.83). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 56.86 vs. CNPAX (37.19).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.302 | 16.307 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 468M | 35,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.20 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 18.25 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 63.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.19 | 56.86 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement