Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.28
Change+$0.54 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.4B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.24M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. ZGFIX (437M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.48) vs ZGFIX (0.21). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.56 vs. ZGFIX (16.36). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.25 vs. CNPAX (38.09).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.518 | 10.284 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 437M | 35,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.21 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.56 | 16.36 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.15 | 35.50 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.09 | 51.25 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement