Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets442.66M
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. ZGFIX (443M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.48) vs ZGFIX (0.21). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX (11.94) and CNPAX (11.64) have marching annual gain over last year. ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.44 vs. CNPAX (31.77).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.222 | 11.364 | 134% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 443M | 35,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.21 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 11.94 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.06 | 41.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | 46.44 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement