Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFIX (335M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.95) vs ZGFIX (0.73). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (9 years). ZGFIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFIX (14.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. ZGFIX (-4.56). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. CNPAX (10.37).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.074 | -2.382 | -129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 335M | 50,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.73 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | -4.56 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.37 | 21.13 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.37 | 18.29 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement