Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ZGFIX
CNPAX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ZGFIX (373M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPAX (0.95) vs ZGFIX (0.73). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (9 years). ZGFIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFIX (14.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPAX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. ZGFIX (-5.34). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.27 vs. CNPAX (15.21).
| CNPAX | ZGFIX | CNPAX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.877 | -3.625 | -135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 373M | 46,113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.73 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -5.34 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | 24.82 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | 20.27 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement