Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs HLGZX
CNPEX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs HLGZX
CNPEX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and HLGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLGZX (541M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: CNPEX (0.74) vs HLGZX (0.59). CNPEX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: CNPEX (24 years) vs HLGZX (9 years). CNPEX (0.98) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.79). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CNPEX (23.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: CNPEX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. HLGZX (-8.99). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.10 vs. HLGZX (-36.34).
| CNPEX | HLGZX | CNPEX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.79 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.188 | 5.032 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 541M | 31,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.59 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -8.99 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.92 | -10.56 | -312% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | -36.34 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement