Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs HLGZX
CNPEX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs HLGZX
CNPEX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and HLGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLGZX (535M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: CNPEX (0.73) vs HLGZX (0.58). CNPEX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: CNPEX (24 years) vs HLGZX (9 years). CNPEX (0.98) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.79). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CNPEX (23.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: CNPEX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.91 vs. HLGZX (-6.12). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 14.84 vs. HLGZX (-34.98).
| CNPEX | HLGZX | CNPEX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.79 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.316 | 4.299 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 535M | 32,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.58 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | -6.12 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.21 | -7.81 | -515% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.84 | -34.98 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement