Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSAGX
CNPEX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSAGX
CNPEX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSAGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. LSAGX (123M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPEX (0.75) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. LSAGX (-3.37). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 13.54 vs. LSAGX (11.95).
| CNPEX | LSAGX | CNPEX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.20 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.33 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.880 | -4.453 | -199% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 123M | 134,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | -3.37 | -241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.16 | 48.22 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.54 | 11.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.80 | 107.46 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement