Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSAGX
CNPEX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSAGX
CNPEX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and LSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSAGX (119M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPEX (0.73) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. LSAGX (-0.75). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. LSAGX (12.29).
| CNPEX | LSAGX | CNPEX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.20 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.33 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.763 | -6.825 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 119M | 144,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | -0.75 | -1,201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.86 | 42.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 12.29 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.51 | 124.11 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers