Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSCGX
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529E
Price$70.23
Change-$0.66 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.17B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$23.04
Change-$0.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.45M
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSCGX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LSCGX (142M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPEX (0.26) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (1.00). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.49 vs. CNPEX (11.16). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.73 vs. CNPEX (38.73).
| CNPEX | LSCGX | CNPEX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.95 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.13 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.758 | 21.875 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 142M | 114,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.16 | 26.49 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.55 | 95.98 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.73 | 41.73 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement