Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSCGX
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSCGX
CNPEX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSCGX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSCGX (119M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPEX (0.73) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPEX (25 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. LSCGX (-11.41). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.86 vs. LSCGX (7.27).
| CNPEX | LSCGX | CNPEX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.95 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 2.08 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.994 | -6.601 | -91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 119M | 142,017% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | -11.41 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.02 | 46.07 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.86 | 7.27 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.87 | 88.29 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers