Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSGGX
CNPEX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSGGX
CNPEX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSGGX (121M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPEX (0.74) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. LSGGX (-1.32). CNPEX (13.63) and LSGGX (13.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPEX | LSGGX | CNPEX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.95 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.08 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.594 | -5.177 | -127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 121M | 140,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | -1.32 | -591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.11 | 46.57 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 13.35 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.41 | 120.62 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement