Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSNGX
CNPEX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529E
Price$67.86
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$23.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.75M
CNPEX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSNGX (131M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPEX (0.27) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPEX (23 years) vs LSNGX (8 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (1.00). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.35 vs. CNPEX (10.83). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.75 vs. CNPEX (44.54).
| CNPEX | LSNGX | CNPEX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.90 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.06 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.818 | 13.244 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 131M | 119,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 23.35 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.84 | 76.86 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.54 | 48.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement