Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs LSNGX
CNPEX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs LSNGX
CNPEX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSNGX (121M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPEX (0.74) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPEX (24 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.01) and CNPEX (0.98) have similar cost to investors . CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSNGX (12.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPEX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. LSNGX (-1.45). LSNGX (12.69) and CNPEX (12.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPEX | LSNGX | CNPEX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.90 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.01 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.188 | -6.176 | -84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 121M | 140,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -1.45 | -482% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.92 | 41.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 12.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement