Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs MGFAX
CNPEX vs MGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs MGFAX
CNPEX vs MGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. MGFAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and MGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFAX (132M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: CNPEX (0.74) vs MGFAX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than MGFAX: CNPEX (24 years) vs MGFAX (22 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). MGFAX (24.00) and CNPEX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: CNPEX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.89 vs. MGFAX (-25.71). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 8.70 vs. MGFAX (-61.29).
| CNPEX | MGFAX | CNPEX / MGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.43 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.43 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.931 | 1.102 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 132M | 128,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | -25.71 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.16 | -35.16 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.70 | -61.29 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.91 | -41.73 | -249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers