Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs MGFSX
CNPEX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs MGFSX
CNPEX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. MGFSX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and MGFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFSX (133M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPEX (0.73) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPEX (25 years) vs MGFSX (22 years). MGFSX (1.03) and CNPEX (0.98) have similar cost to investors . MGFSX (24.00) and CNPEX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPEX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPEX (250). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. MGFSX (-22.67). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.86 vs. MGFSX (-57.44).
| CNPEX | MGFSX | CNPEX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.03 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.03 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.994 | 5.486 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 133M | 127,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | -22.67 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.02 | -25.66 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.86 | -57.44 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.87 | -34.27 | -318% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers