Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs MGFSX
CNPEX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs MGFSX
CNPEX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. MGFSX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and MGFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFSX (135M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPEX (0.74) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPEX (24 years) vs MGFSX (22 years). MGFSX (1.03) and CNPEX (0.98) have similar cost to investors . MGFSX (24.00) and CNPEX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPEX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPEX (250). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. MGFSX (-20.95). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.06 vs. MGFSX (-56.38).
| CNPEX | MGFSX | CNPEX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.03 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.03 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.737 | 3.491 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 135M | 125,926% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | -20.95 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.64 | -29.54 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.06 | -56.38 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.13 | -33.62 | -316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement