Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs WAGSX
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs WAGSX
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. WAGSX (12.6M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPEX (0.73) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPEX (24 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPEX (23.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPEX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. WAGSX (-2.77). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 18.16 vs. WAGSX (-16.52).
| CNPEX | WAGSX | CNPEX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.36 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 2.81 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.137 | 2.850 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 12.6M | 1,301,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.48 | -2.77 | -486% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.70 | 20.52 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.16 | -16.52 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement