Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs WGGSX
CNPEX vs WGGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs WGGSX
CNPEX vs WGGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. WGGSX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and WGGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WGGSX (12.8M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than WGGSX: CNPEX (0.75) vs WGGSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than WGGSX: CNPEX (24 years) vs WGGSX (7 years). WGGSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (0.98). WGGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPEX (23.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGSX: CNPEX (250) vs WGGSX (100000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. WGGSX (1.75). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 13.95 vs. WGGSX (-17.62).
| CNPEX | WGGSX | CNPEX / WGGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.96 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.71 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.276 | 6.195 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 12.8M | 1,296,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 1.75 | 477% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.09 | 23.68 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | -17.62 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers