Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs ZGFAX
CNPEX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs ZGFAX
CNPEX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ZGFAX (356M). CNPEX (0.73) and ZGFAX (0.73) have matching dividends . CNPEX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPEX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). CNPEX (0.98) is less costly to investors than ZGFAX (0.86). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPEX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.91 vs. ZGFAX (-3.76). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.21 vs. CNPEX (14.84).
| CNPEX | ZGFAX | CNPEX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.86 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.86 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.316 | -4.735 | -133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 356M | 48,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | -3.76 | -344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.21 | 23.37 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.84 | 18.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement