Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ESGMX
CNPFX vs ESGMX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ESGMX
CNPFX vs ESGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ESGMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ESGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ESGMX (651M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: CNPFX (1.12) vs ESGMX (0.14). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ESGMX: CNPFX (24 years) vs ESGMX (10 years). ESGMX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGMX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: CNPFX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. ESGMX (4.89). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. ESGMX (3.80).
| CNPFX | ESGMX | CNPFX / ESGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.20 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | -2.058 | -317% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 651M | 26,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.14 | 816% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 4.89 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 26.54 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | 3.80 | 459% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 124.48 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers