Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs FCGIX
CNPFX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs FCGIX
CNPFX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCGIX (44.3M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPFX (1.12) vs FCGIX (0.54). CNPFX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPFX (24 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPFX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. FCGIX (11.49). FCGIX (18.07) and CNPFX (17.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | FCGIX | CNPFX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.85 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.37 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | 5.667 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 44.3M | 388,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.54 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 11.49 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 25.26 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | 18.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers