Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSAGX
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$71.79
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$25.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.03M
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSAGX (141M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPFX (0.64) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSAGX (9 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.69 vs. CNPFX (14.87). LSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.53 vs. CNPFX (41.03).
| CNPFX | LSAGX | CNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.38 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.270 | 22.811 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 141M | 115,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 30.69 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.19 | 88.43 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.03 | 48.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.59 | N/A | - |