Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSAGX
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSAGX
CNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSAGX (121M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPFX (1.12) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPFX (24 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. LSAGX (-2.30). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.05 vs. LSAGX (10.81).
| CNPFX | LSAGX | CNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.20 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.33 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.833 | -6.159 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 121M | 142,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | -2.30 | -312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 43.36 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.05 | 10.81 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | 117.89 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement