Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.85
Change-$0.47 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.26
Change-$0.19 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.51M
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (136M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (0.65) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.48 vs. CNPFX (11.89). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.48 vs. LSCGX (29.17).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.13 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.074 | 16.927 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 136M | 116,912% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 26.48 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.93 | 70.08 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 29.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.74 | N/A | - |