Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSCGX
CNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. LSCGX (125M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPFX (1.12) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPFX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. LSCGX (5.05). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.68 vs. LSCGX (13.06).
| CNPFX | LSCGX | CNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.08 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.417 | -2.829 | -262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 125M | 131,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 5.05 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.81 | 49.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.68 | 13.06 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.31 | 109.75 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers