Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MECFX
CNPFX vs MECFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MECFX
CNPFX vs MECFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MECFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MECFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MECFX (136M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MECFX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MECFX (0.40). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MECFX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MECFX (10 years). MECFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MECFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECFX: CNPFX (250) vs MECFX (1000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. MECFX (10.98). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. MECFX (8.61).
| CNPFX | MECFX | CNPFX / MECFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.90 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | 7.890 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 136M | 126,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.40 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 10.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 37.23 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | 8.61 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers