Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGFAX
CNPFX vs MGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.70
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.65B
MassMutual Global A
Price$10.46
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.9M
CNPFX vs MGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGFAX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MGFAX (153M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: CNPFX (0.61) vs MGFAX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MGFAX (21 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFAX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. MGFAX (-0.38). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. MGFAX (-37.78).
| CNPFX | MGFAX | CNPFX / MGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.43 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.43 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.769 | 14.396 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 153M | 105,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.48 | -0.38 | -3,521% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.66 | -11.78 | -422% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.17 | -37.78 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.51 | -28.39 | -372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement