Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGFAX
CNPFX vs MGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGFAX
CNPFX vs MGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGFAX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFAX (144M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGFAX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGFAX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGFAX (21 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MGFAX (24.00) and CNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. MGFAX (-19.33). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.07 vs. MGFAX (-57.36).
| CNPFX | MGFAX | CNPFX / MGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.43 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.43 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.949 | 6.887 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 144M | 119,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | -19.33 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.75 | -30.09 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.07 | -57.36 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.91 | -35.36 | -365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers