Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGFLX
CNPFX vs MGFLX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGFLX
CNPFX vs MGFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGFLX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGFLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFLX (143M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGFLX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGFLX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGFLX (21 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MGFLX (24.00) and CNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPFX: MGFLX (0) vs CNPFX (250). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. MGFLX (-17.97). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.37 vs. MGFLX (-55.23).
| CNPFX | MGFLX | CNPFX / MGFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.209 | 5.762 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 143M | 120,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | -17.97 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | -25.92 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.37 | -55.23 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.10 | -32.51 | -379% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers