Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGFZX
CNPFX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGFZX
CNPFX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGFZX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFZX (143M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MGFZX (24.00) and CNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPFX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPFX (250). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. MGFZX (-16.71). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.07 vs. MGFZX (-53.53).
| CNPFX | MGFZX | CNPFX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.93 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.93 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.949 | 6.551 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 143M | 120,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | -16.71 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.75 | -25.43 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.07 | -53.53 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.91 | -27.33 | -472% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement