Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGKAX
CNPFX vs MGKAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGKAX
CNPFX vs MGKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGKAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MGKAX (4.72M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGKAX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGKAX (0.88). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGKAX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGKAX (7 years). MGKAX (8.98) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: CNPFX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. MGKAX (-7.07). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.84 vs. MGKAX (-13.20).
| CNPFX | MGKAX | CNPFX / MGKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.35 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 8.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 3.905 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 4.72M | 3,476,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.88 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | -7.07 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 0.86 | 5,185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | -13.20 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement