Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGTSX
CNPFX vs MGTSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGTSX
CNPFX vs MGTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGTSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGTSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MGTSX (3.05B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGTSX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGTSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGTSX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGTSX (13 years). MGTSX (0.85) and CNPFX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGTSX (11.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGTSX: CNPFX (250) vs MGTSX (5000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. MGTSX (-3.92). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.84 vs. MGTSX (-16.78).
| CNPFX | MGTSX | CNPFX / MGTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.85 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.85 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 5.647 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 3.05B | 5,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | -3.92 | -357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 43.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | -16.78 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 130.32 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement