Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGWRX
CNPFX vs MGWRX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGWRX
CNPFX vs MGWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGWRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGWRX (799M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGWRX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MGWRX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGWRX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MGWRX (23 years). MGWRX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX (23.00) and MGWRX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPFX: MGWRX (0) vs CNPFX (250). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. MGWRX (-2.89). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. MGWRX (-6.21).
| CNPFX | MGWRX | CNPFX / MGWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.47 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | -3.796 | -172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 799M | 21,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -2.89 | -466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 6.66 | 633% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | -6.21 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 83.92 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement