Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MLMAX
CNPFX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MLMAX
CNPFX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MLMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MLMAX (64.7M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MLMAX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MLMAX (10 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: CNPFX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.95 vs. CNPFX (14.01). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.14 vs. CNPFX (20.84).
| CNPFX | MLMAX | CNPFX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.35 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.85 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 4.616 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 64.7M | 253,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 15.95 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 63.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | 43.14 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 153.16 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement