Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$64.52
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.21B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$61.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets929.8M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. MWOFX (930M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.73) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. MWOFX (-0.78). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.33 vs. MWOFX (40.51).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.194 | 1.916 | 323% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 930M | 16,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.01 | 11,563% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -0.78 | -893% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.72 | 21.43 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.33 | 40.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.61 | 75.85 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement