Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.87B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$66.47
Change+$0.21 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.36M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. MWOFX (939M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.62) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. MWOFX (0.43). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.47 vs. MWOFX (23.24).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.840 | 7.906 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 939M | 17,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.01 | 10,779% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.31 | 0.43 | 3,568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.41 | 37.42 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | 23.24 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.20 | 96.62 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement