Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.81
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.86M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MWOFX (896M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.61) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. MWOFX (-2.12). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.78 vs. MWOFX (15.00).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.656 | 3.815 | 437% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 896M | 17,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.01 | 10,689% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.83 | -2.12 | -558% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 23.89 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.78 | 15.00 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.50 | 87.94 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers