Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$66.01
Change-$0.79 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$62.14
Change-$1.12 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.11M
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MWOFX (914M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (0.68) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. MWOFX (0.36). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.14 vs. MWOFX (35.87).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.748 | 2.695 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 914M | 16,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.01 | 11,308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 0.36 | 2,529% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.46 | 28.19 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.14 | 35.87 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.62 | 81.08 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers