Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MWOFX
CNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MWOFX (799M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPFX (1.12) vs MWOFX (0.11). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPFX (24 years) vs MWOFX (33 years). MWOFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX (23.00) and MWOFX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. MWOFX (-2.32). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. MWOFX (-3.89).
| CNPFX | MWOFX | CNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.22 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | -3.676 | -177% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 799M | 21,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.11 | 977% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -2.32 | -580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 8.26 | 510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | -3.89 | -448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 91.53 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers