Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGERX
CNPFX vs RGERX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGERX
CNPFX vs RGERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGERX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and RGERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGERX (834M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGERX: CNPFX (1.12) vs RGERX (0.46). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGERX: CNPFX (24 years) vs RGERX (19 years). RGERX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). RGERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). RGERX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPFX: RGERX (0) vs CNPFX (250). RGERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.09 vs. CNPFX (14.01). RGERX return over 5 years is better than : 24.62 vs. CNPFX (20.84).
| CNPFX | RGERX | CNPFX / RGERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.92 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.95 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 15.236 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 834M | 19,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.46 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 17.09 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 45.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | 24.62 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 133.28 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement