Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SCGVX
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SCGVX
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SCGVX (794M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: CNPFX (1.12) vs SCGVX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: CNPFX (24 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). SCGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: CNPFX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. SCGVX (-27.84). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. SCGVX (-45.31).
| CNPFX | SCGVX | CNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.22 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.22 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | 3.030 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 794M | 21,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -27.84 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | -9.13 | -461% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | -45.31 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 37.12 | 367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers