Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SCMGX
CNPFX vs SCMGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SCMGX
CNPFX vs SCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SCMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and SCMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SCMGX (794M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SCMGX: CNPFX (1.12) vs SCMGX (0.07). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SCMGX: CNPFX (24 years) vs SCMGX (16 years). SCMGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). SCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCMGX: CNPFX (250) vs SCMGX (1000000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. SCMGX (-26.62). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. SCMGX (-43.67).
| CNPFX | SCMGX | CNPFX / SCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | 3.106 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 794M | 21,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.07 | 1,668% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -26.62 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | -6.91 | -610% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | -43.67 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 43.00 | 317% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers