Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SGACX
CNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SGACX
CNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and SGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SGACX (146M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: CNPFX (1.12) vs SGACX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: CNPFX (24 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: CNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. SGACX (-19.45). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. SGACX (-42.96).
| CNPFX | SGACX | CNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.00 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.12 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | -6.887 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 146M | 117,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -19.45 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | -24.36 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | -42.96 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | 15.13 | 900% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers